Recall Effort Against Supervisor Joel Engardio Gains Momentum
In San Francisco, District 4 Supervisor Joel Engardio is facing a recall attempt initiated by a group of local residents. This movement has emerged in response to Engardio’s support for Proposition K, which seeks to convert a significant portion of the Great Highway into a permanent park. The proposition was approved by voters in the recent November elections.
Details of the Recall Filing
On a recent Tuesday, the group pushing for the recall officially submitted the necessary paperwork to initiate the process. While there is clear dissatisfaction among certain constituents, local political analysts suggest that achieving a successful recall may prove challenging.
Political Landscape and Challenges
Political analysts recognize the potential threats to Engardio’s position amid an ongoing wave of anti-incumbent sentiment in San Francisco. Despite the concerns raised by his constituents, experts believe that wealthy donors, likely allies of Engardio, may provide financial support if the recall reaches voters. Jason McDaniel, a political science associate professor at San Francisco State University, noted that Engardio’s principled stance on Proposition K is at odds with the views of many in his district, which could jeopardize his position.
Community Reactions and Opinions
“Voters have a right to recall their elected leaders. I respectfully ask voters to consider the entirety of my work representing them, and not just this one issue,” Engardio stated on his blog in reaction to the recall effort.
David Latterman, a retired political strategist, shared skepticism about the feasibility of the recall, citing a historical trend where such efforts frequently stall. He mentioned, “Every year some group of people is pissed off, and they say they’re going to recall the supes, and it never, ever happens.” However, he acknowledged that a strong competitor could pose a risk to Engardio in future elections.
Financial Implications and Community Support
The need for substantial financial backing remains a critical factor in the success of the recall. Political strategist David Ho emphasized that previous recalls in the area typically received support from wealthy individuals. He stated, “The difference between this recall threat and past ones is that you don’t have a billionaire backing it.” Furthermore, Latterman pointed out that affluent stakeholders could rally behind Engardio to counter the recall.
Prominent figures, such as former local Democratic Party leader Mary Jung and billionaire Chris Larsen, have publicly declared their support for Engardio, arguing that recalls should be reserved for issues of corruption rather than policy disagreements.
Signature Requirements and Future Outlook
The recall campaign, led by Vin Budhai, requires at least 9,900 valid signatures from District 4 voters to advance the recall measure to a ballot. Budhai expressed optimism about gathering support from local residents without reliance on wealthy donors, although he acknowledged potential escalating costs as the process progresses.
Continuing Controversy Over the Great Highway
The conflict surrounding Proposition K is far from resolved. Engardio’s support for the initiative has deepened divisions within his constituency, with some individuals like Ed Ho—who previously endorsed Engardio—now opposing him. The group opposing Proposition K also plans to challenge the city’s permit application to close the Great Highway to vehicle traffic, marking an ongoing struggle over the future of this significant area.
As political experts observe this unfolding situation, the potential effects of the recall effort remain to be seen. McDaniel concluded, “The issue is not going away. It’s not like the park is there now and the issue is over.”
